Get ready for some potential TV turbulence, Disney fans! As we approach September 1st, Disney-owned networks like ESPN and ABC might go dark for DirecTV subscribers if a new distribution deal isn’t reached. With the NFL season kicking off, Disney is standing firm on its demands while DirecTV seems to be holding out for more flexibility in its channel packages.
According to Disney Platform Distribution President Justin Connolly, despite putting several “tangible options” on the table, DirecTV has yet to engage earnestly. “We’re far apart,” Connolly admits, spotlighting the urgency to find common ground before the current agreement expires on September 1. DirecTV’s pressing for more customized package options, even suggesting genre-based bundles that could include Disney+ and Hulu.
Connolly emphasized that Disney’s proposals have been “flexible and innovative,” inspired by the recent Charter Communications deal, where a 12-day blackout ended with Spectrum TV rolling out Disney+ and ESPN+ at no extra cost for select customers. DirecTV, however, wants to pay only for those subscribers who actively use these streaming services.
Adding fuel to the fire, DirecTV’s Chief Content Officer Rob Thun argues for “flexible packages” and “lower-priced alternatives” akin to streaming services, insisting that consumers deserve more choice and control. DirecTV, a part of AT&T with a minor stake held by TPG, has seen a significant drop in its subscribers over the past few years, heightening the stakes for these negotiations.
For now, talks are ongoing at DirecTV’s headquarters in El Segundo, California. The clock is ticking, and if a deal isn’t inked by September 1, millions of viewers might miss out on Disney’s rich lineup of channels just as football season heats up.
What do you think about this standoff? Share your thoughts in the comments and keep the conversation going!
Source: Todd Spangler
