Could subscribing to Disney+ really prevent you from suing Disney over a tragic incident at their parks? In a surprising legal twist, the Walt Disney Company contends that a Disney+ streaming service agreement signed by Jeffrey Piccolo in 2019 voids his right to sue over his wife’s wrongful death after dining at a Disney Springs restaurant.
In 2023, Kanokporn Tangsuan tragically lost her life following a severe allergic reaction. Despite Disney Springs’ Raglan Road Irish Pub assuring them of allergen-free dishes, Tangsuan experienced an anaphylactic shock resulting in her death, according to medical reports. Her husband, Jeffrey, is seeking over $50,000 from Disney, along with damages for emotional distress and financial losses.
Disney’s defense hinges on the arbitration clause in their Disney+ terms and conditions, which mandates that disputes must be resolved through individual arbitration, not court. Piccolo’s lawyer claims this stance is “absurd,” especially given that the agreement predates their theme park visit and should not apply to unrelated situations.
This lawsuit draws attention to the wider implications of arbitration clauses in consumer contracts, which often limit the legal recourse available to individuals. Are these terms fair, or do they tip the scales in favor of corporations? Share your thoughts on this intriguing legal battle in the comments below!
Source: [Natalie Dreier, Cox Media Group National Content Desk](https://www.wgauradio.com/news/trending/disney-defense-disney-says-wrongful-death-suit-should-be-thrown-out-because-streaming-agreement/UI7YCJKAYFF5TA76ORWRC4ZW2I/)
